(PC) Woolery v. Shasta County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 14, 20212:21-cv-00166California4,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACOB DAVID WOOLERY, No. 2:21-cv-0166 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants have interfered with his right to file grievances and to apply for parole. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 11), his motion for discovery (ECF No. 8), his motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 10), and his amended complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motions for discovery and to appoint counsel, and dismiss the complaint with leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 11.) Accordingly, the request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.