(PS) Conerly v. Kaiser Permanente

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CONERLY, et al., No. 2:19-cv-2535 JAM DB PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND SHARIF TARPIN, et al. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs James Conerly, Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, Carina Conerly, and M.T. are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are numerous motions, including defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 88-95, 99, 109), defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 97), defendant’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 106), and plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 88, 139.) For the reasons explained below, the undersigned finds that defendants’ motions to dismiss should be granted, plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment denied, and plaintiffs’ second amended complaint dismissed without further leave to amend. BACKGROUND …