Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE No. 2:19-cv-02483 JAM AC
COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE
HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; MOUNT
SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY
CENTER; and QUALITY ORDER
ENVIRONMENT,
14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THEINTERIOR; CALPINE
CORPORATION; and CPN TELEPHONE
FLAT, INC.,
19 Defendants.
21 This case is before the court on cross-motions regarding discovery: defendant Bureau of Land Management and Department of Interior’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 85) is joined by defendants CPN Telephone Flat, Inc. and Calpine (“Calpine defendants”); the Calpine defendants separately move for a protective order (ECF No. 86); and plaintiffs bring a motion to compel (ECF No. 89). These discovery motions were referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1), and were taken under submission. ECF No. 92. The parties filed a comprehensive joint statement addressing all motions. ECF No. 93. …