Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20212:19-cv-02483California3,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE No. 2:19-cv-02483 JAM AC

COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE

HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; MOUNT

SHASTA BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY

CENTER; and QUALITY ORDER

ENVIRONMENT,

14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

THEINTERIOR; CALPINE

CORPORATION; and CPN TELEPHONE

FLAT, INC.,

19 Defendants.

21 This case is before the court on cross-motions regarding discovery: defendant Bureau of Land Management and Department of Interior’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 85) is joined by defendants CPN Telephone Flat, Inc. and Calpine (“Calpine defendants”); the Calpine defendants separately move for a protective order (ECF No. 86); and plaintiffs bring a motion to compel (ECF No. 89). These discovery motions were referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(1), and were taken under submission. ECF No. 92. The parties filed a comprehensive joint statement addressing all motions. ECF No. 93. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.