Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20211:21-cv-00327California1,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF. No. 14) KELLY SANTORO, et al., Defendants. 16 On April 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 14). For the reasons described in this order, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on March 1, 2021. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that he was subjected to two strip searches within five days. Plaintiff does not challenge the first strip search, but appears to allege that, in forcing Plaintiff to submit to a second strip search, Defendants violated his First, Fourth, and Eighth Amendment rights. On March 24, 2021, the Court issued a screening order. (ECF No. 11). The Court found that Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.