Baeza

(PC) John E. Mitchell v. Baeza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20211:20-cv-00857California1,621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

24 Plaintiff John Edward Mitchell (“plaintiff”), a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing 25 a pro se, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against eight correctional officials (“defendants”) at CDCR 26 – Corcoran on June 22, 2020. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff paid the filing fee to proceed in this action.

1 (See docket entry dated July 8, 2020). Plaintiff is now proceeding on his amended complaint filed on November 23, 2020. (Doc. Nos. 7, 8, 10). The amended complaint complains about various unrelated incidents that occurred while plaintiff was incarcerated at CRCR-Corcoran. Plaintiff states in his amended complaint that he is now incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison in Ione, California. (See Doc. No. 10 at 1). Plaintiff filed the instant motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction seeking: (1) to be housed exclusively in prisons with cameras that “monitor all areas,” that offer single cell housing, that lack “Known Security Threat Group inmates,” and do not employ any of the defendants or their family members; (2) for correctional officials to rule on his past staff complaints and grievances; (3) to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.