Jaime

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TODD CHRISTIAN ROBBEN, No. 2:18-cv-2545 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER GEORGE JAIME, Respondent. 16 By order filed November 20, 2019, the court dismissed this action, ECF No. 47, and judgment was entered the same day, ECF No. 48. On January 22, 2020, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration invoking Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). ECF No. 53. “Rule 60(b) enumerates specific circumstances in which a party may be relieved of the effect of a judgment, such as mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud, and the like. The Rule concludes with a catchall category—subdivision (b)(6)—providing that a court may lift a judgment for ‘any other reason that justifies relief.’” Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 771-72 (2017) (citation omitted). Further, Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or ///// 27 1 …