(PC) Haines v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20212:20-cv-01011California1,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARCUS A. HAINES, Case No. 2:20-cv-01011-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendants. WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS

CASE BE DISMISSED

16 ECF No. 13

SIXTY-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Marcus A. Haines is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil 20 rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He proceeds on his first amended complaint and 21 alleges that the County of Sacramento and the Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center violated his 22 rights by failing to take precautions to protect him from Covid-19. ECF No. 13 at 3. I find, for 23 the reasons stated below, that plaintiff’s complaint does not state a cognizable claim. I will give 24 him leave to amend. 25 Screening and Pleading Requirements 26 A federal court must screen a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.