(PS) Peccia v. State of CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20212:18-cv-03049California810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAKE PECCIA, No. 2:18-cv-03049 JAM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for an extension of the discovery deadline (ECF No. 40). Plaintiff is appearing in pro se. This matter is before the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendant opposes the motion. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff has replied. ECF No. 46. Upon review of all arguments and briefing, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED in part, but the approved extension is for 30 days rather than the requested 180. I. Relevant Background Plaintiff filed this discrimination and retaliation case against his former employer, the State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) on November 26, 2018. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff was initially represented by counsel. Counsel was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.