K.M.

K.M. v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20211:17-cv-01431California4,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 K.M., No. 1:17-cv-01431 NONE JLT

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND

v. AWARDING ADDITIONAL FEES FOR RESPONDING TO OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS

TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DISTRICT, et al., (Doc. Nos. 58, 91) Defendants.

BACKGROUND In this case, K.M., through her guardian ad litem, sought damages under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Rehabilitation Act, and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (Doc. No. 14.) On January 31, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion seeking approval of a minor’s compromise. (Doc. No. 44.) The assigned magistrate judge recommended approval of that motion (Doc. No. 47), and the previously-assigned district judge adopted that recommendation on February 28, 2019 (Doc. No. 48). When the parties thereafter failed to timely submit dismissal documents, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.