(PC) Gleason v. Lee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS LEE GLEASON, JR., Case No. 2:19-cv-00621-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES
M. VOONG, et al., ECF No. 51 Defendants.
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS 17 On December 16, 2020, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant 18 to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(c). ECF No. 51. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response 19 to the motion. 20 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party 21 is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the 22 date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a 23 statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the 24 motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” …