Lopez
Lopez v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEPH LOPEZ, JOSHUA SARRIS, No. 2:20-cv-01310-JAM-JDP CODY DANTE, and SHANE PECK, 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION v. TO DISMISS
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.,
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 15 Defendant. 16 Joseph Lopez, Joshua Sarris, Cody Dante, and Shane Peck (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Booz Allen Hamilton (“Defendant” or “BAH”) for pre-employment fraud, termination in violation of public policy, and rescission of contract. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 17. Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first claim for pre-employment fraud and Plaintiff Sarris’s third claim for rescission. Mot., ECF No. 18. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.1
1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for March 9, 2021. I. BACKGROUND A recitation…