Lozano

(HC) Young v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20212:20-cv-00350California606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD A. YOUNG, No. 2:20-cv-00350-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER JARED LOZANO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner Howard A. Young (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 26, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 15.) On DATE, Petitioner filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 22), which have been considered by the Court. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.