Rodriguez

(PC) Bahena v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20211:20-cv-01685California490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESMELING BAHENA, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01685-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

RODRIGUEZ, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS ) ) (ECF No. 12) )

Plaintiff Esmeling Bahena is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 11, 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that he stated cognizable failure to protect claim against Defendants Farlon, Rodriguez, Stan and Hernandez, and a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendant Harmon. (ECF No. 8.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Id.) Therefore, Plaintiff was advised that he could file an amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.