Fox

(HC) Bagsby v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20212:19-cv-00192California1,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEONARD BAGSBY, No. 2:19-cv-0192 WBS AC Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROBERT FOX, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, superseded by three amended petitions, together with applications to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (Habeas Rules) requires the court to summarily dismiss a habeas petition, “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” The several habeas petitions (ECF Nos. 1, 8, 9 & 10) all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.