Gipson

(PC) Rios v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20211:14-cv-00520California426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RENO FUENTES RIOS, Case No. 1:14-cv-00520-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE GIPSON, et al., (ECF No. 69) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Reno Fuentes Rios (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint against Defendants Gipson, Mayo, Pina, Ortega, and Garcia 20 for improper gang validation in retaliation for filing grievances, in violation of the First 21 Amendment. 22 On July 21, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that 23 there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact that Defendants did not violate Plaintiff’s 24 constitutional rights, and that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. (ECF No. 62.) In 25 the motion, Plaintiff was provided with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.