Knight

(PC) Rodriguez v. Knight

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20212:19-cv-02552California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELADIO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:19-cv-2552 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. KNIGHT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants used excessive force against him and denied him due process in violation of his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an interpreter. Plaintiff requests the court appoint a Spanish interpreter for the settlement conference set for May 25, 2021 before Magistrate Judge Delaney. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff has not provided any arguments in support of his request. “[T]he expenditure of public funds [on behalf of an indigent litigant] is proper only when authorized by Congress . . . .” Tedder v. Odel, 890 F.2d 210, 211-12 (9th Cir. 1989) (quoting United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 321 (1976)). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.