Smith v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20212:19-cv-01426California876 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD SMITH, KRISTINA No. 2:19-cv-01426 TLN CKD

FLESHMAN,

12 Plaintiffs, 13 v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants.

18 Before the court are the unopposed motions to compel filed by defendant Angela Vickers (ECF No. 19) and defendant City of Sacramento (ECF No. 20). These matters were calendared for hearing on April 7, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. The court finds it appropriate to resolve the motions without a hearing. Good cause shown, the motions to compel are granted. Within 14 days, plaintiffs’ counsel shall file a status report addressing the matters identified below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this action in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, after which the case was removed to this court. Plaintiffs’ complaint brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for unwarranted seizure, unwarranted non-consensual medical examination, Monell-related claims, and wrongful death in relation to events that occurred in 2017 after one of their children was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.