(HC) Gibbs v. Shasta County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20212:21-cv-00027California183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT ALAN GIBBS, No. 2:21-cv-0027 WBS CKD P Petitioner, V. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent. 16 Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute mght to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 19 (Oth Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage 20 || of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. 21 || Inthe present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the 22 || appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s April 14, 2021 request for 24 || appointment of counsel is denied. Dated: April 16, 2021 es ) dj es {a— CAROLYN K. DELANEY …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.