(SS) Maseda v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20211:20-cv-01657California868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANNETTE SUE MASEDA, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01657 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION v. ) (Doc. 13)

ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) )

Annette Sue Maseda filed this action for judicial review of an administrative decision denying her application for Social Security benefits. (See Doc. 1.) Nicole Schmidt seeks to substitute as plaintiff pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 13.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED without prejudice. I. Background Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on November 20, 2020. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff asserted she is disabled, and asserts the findings by the Commissioner to deny benefits were “not supported by substantial evidence and are contrary to law and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.