Dhillon

(PC) Cassells v. Dhillon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20212:19-cv-00644California539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH MICHAEL CASSELLS, Case No. 2:19-cv-00644-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

BALRAJ SINGH DHILLON, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL

RULES

Defendant.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 18 On November 6, 2020, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 23. In violation of Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff failed to timely file a response to defendant’s motion. Accordingly, on January 22, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff was notified that if he wished to continue this lawsuit, he also needed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.