Velasco

(PC) Gradford v. Velasco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20211:20-cv-00543California687 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, No. 1:20-cv-00543-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO AUTHENTICATE WITNESS

STATEMENTS BE DENIED, WITHOUT

F. VELASCO and T. WEBSTER, PREJUDICE Defendants. (ECF No. 37) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR LEAVE BE DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

18 (ECF No. 39)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”), a former pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil-rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, commenced this action by filing a complaint on April 16, 2020. (ECF No. 1). On April 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed a document entitled “request as to authenticate witnesses signed statements attached to original complaint and submit into evidence (admissible).” (ECF No. 37). On April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.