Gradford
Gradford v. Gray
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, Case No. 1:21-cv-00421-AWI-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING CERTAIN
v. CLAIMS
ANDY GRAY, (ECF Nos. 4, 5)
Defendant. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2021, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and found to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was ordered to either file a first amended complaint or notice of intent to proceed on the cognizable claim within thirty days. (Id.) On April 1, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice stating that he wished to proceed on the cognizable claims. (ECF No. 5.) Accordingly, the Court recommends that this action proceed on Plaintiff’s claim that Andy Gray (“Defendant”) extended his probation based on fabricated evidence in retaliation for Plaintiff filing complaints and all…