Moore

Moore v. County of Merced

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20211:19-cv-01183California389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEANNE MOORE, No. 1:19-cv-01183-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND

v. CLOSE THE CASE COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., (Doc. 37) Defendants. 16 17 On April 13, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation, signed by all parties who have 18 appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 19 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 37.) 20 In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: 21 [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after 24 service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all the parties who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.