(PC) Villalobos v. Tiggs-Brown, P.A

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20211:19-cv-00442California4,061 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

facts related to that claim. 24 2 To the extent the Court necessarily relied on evidence that has been objected to, the Court relied only on evidence it considered to be admissible. Generally, it is not the practice of the Court to rule on evidentiary matters individually in the context of summary judgment. This is particularly true when “many of the objections are boilerplate recitations of evidentiary principles or blanket objections without analysis applied to specific items of 26 evidence.” Capital Records, LLC v. BlueBeat, Inc., 765 F.Supp.2d 1198, 1200 n.1 (C.D. Cal. 2010) (quoting Doe v. Starbucks, Inc., 2009 WL 5183773, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2009)).

3 Defendant contends that this was Plaintiff’s first visit with her, and Plaintiff contends he also saw Defendant twice between November 28 and December 3, 2015. (UMF 22, 24.) Plaintiff submitted a Health Care Services Request Form (CDC 7362) on January 2, 2016, because he had broken his cast on December 31, 2015. (UMF 38.) Plaintiff indicated that he was in a lot of pain and needed to be seen as soon as possible. (UMF 38.) Plaintiff was seen by Registered Nurse Dyksinski on January 4, 2016, who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.