United States v. Richardson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20211:19-cv-00275California2,722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0275 NONE JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER VACATING THE HEARING DATE OF ) APRIL 16, 2021 v. ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DONALD R. RICHARDSON, et al., ) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) DEFAULT JUDGMENT Defendants. ) (Doc. 45) )

The Government seeks to enforce a federal judgment lien and federal tax liens against certain real property in Bakersfield, California, owned by judgment debtor Donald Richardson. (See generally Doc. 1.) Because Richardson failed to respond to the allegations in the complaint, the Government now seeks default judgment against Richardson. (Doc. 45.) The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Therefore, the Court takes the motion under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order 618, and the hearing date of April 16, 2021 is VACATED. For the following reasons, the Court recommends the motion for default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.