Hanover Insurance. Co. v. Brian Goldman, MD

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20212:18-cv-01593California2,647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, No. 2:18-cv-01593-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER BRIAN GOLDMAN, M.D., et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Hanover Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte Application to Continue the Hearing Date on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment to Allow Discovery to be Completed. (ECF No. 51.) Defendants Michael Hague (“Hague”) and Laura Mackie (“Mackie”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed an objection. (ECF No. 52.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application. /// /// ///

Defendant Brian Goldman, M.D., a Medical Corporation joins in Defendants’ objection. (ECF No. 55.) Defendants have also filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s ex parte application. (ECF No. 53.) As Defendants may not have both an objection and an opposition to Plaintiff’s application, the Court construes Defendants’ objection as an opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.