Petersen

Petersen v. Buyard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20211:20-cv-00954California1,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:20-cv-00954-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING STAYING THIS

v. ACTION PENDING COMPLETION OF

PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL TO THE NINTH

MEKISHA BUYARD, CIRCUIT Defendant. TWENTY-ONE-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action by filing a civil-rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 9, 2020. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that Defendant Mekisha Buyard (“Defendant”), his former parole agent, violated his Fourth Amendment rights by sending his cellular phones to federal agents in a manner not permitted by his parole conditions. Plaintiff pleaded guilty to federal offenses in a case in this district. Plaintiff’s appeal, which is currently pending before the Ninth Circuit, deals with issues that are intertwined with issues in this case.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.