Newsom

(PC) Gardner v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20211:20-cv-00240California355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONDEL DELBERT GARDNER, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00240-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) CLOSE THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO THE

PARTIES’ STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY

GAVIN NEWSOM, et.al., ) DISMISSAL ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 82) ) )

Plaintiff Rondel Delbert Gardner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 12, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 82.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.