Fielder

(PC) Rice v. Fielder

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20212:18-cv-02743California412 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KORDY RICE, No. 2:18-cv-02743-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER FIELDER, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kordy Rice’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s November 20, 2020 Order (ECF No. 41). (ECF No. 43.) For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 20, 2020, the magistrate judge issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a hearing on his pending motions to compel, noting that “under the Court’s local rules, motions in prisoner cases are submitted on the papers without hearing.” (ECF No. 41 (citing E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l)).) /// /// Pursuant to Eastern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.