Fielder
(PC) Rice v. Fielder
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KORDY RICE, No. 2:18-cv-02743-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER FIELDER, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kordy Rice’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s November 20, 2020 Order (ECF No. 41). (ECF No. 43.) For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 20, 2020, the magistrate judge issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a hearing on his pending motions to compel, noting that “under the Court’s local rules, motions in prisoner cases are submitted on the papers without hearing.” (ECF No. 41 (citing E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l)).) /// /// Pursuant to Eastern…