Berlin

(PC) Beaton v. Berlin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20212:19-cv-00313California1,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 2:19-CV-0313-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. ECF No. 46. Plaintiff’s handwritten motion is nearly incomprehensible, but it appears that Plaintiff takes issue with an alleged theft of money from him. Id. Plaintiff contends that the United States Bankruptcy Court sent him a check and that Defendant K. Berlin unconstitutionally took it. Id. The undersigned United States Magistrate Judge recommends denying the motion. I. STANDARD The legal principles applicable to requests for injunctive relief, such as a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are well established. To prevail, the moving party must show that irreparable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.