(PS)Meeks
(PS)Meeks v. Butte County Children's Services Division
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANAI MEEKS, et al., No. 2:21-cv-0049 KJM DB PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER BUTTE COUNTY CHILDREN’S SERVICES DIVISION and OROVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Janai Meeks, M.S., A.H., S.F., and KJ Jr., are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiffs’ complaint and plaintiff Janai Meeks’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The complaint concerns an alleged unlawful seizure by the defendants. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiffs’ complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ complaint will be dismissed with leave…