(PS) Wallace v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20212:20-cv-02265California544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEVELAND WALLACE; RITA No. 2:20-cv-2265 TLN DB PS WALLACE, Claimant at Law, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14 ROSEMARY LYNCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Cleveland Wallace and Rita Wallace are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 13, 2020, plaintiffs filed a complaint and paid the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) Accordingly, summons were issued. (ECF Nos. 2 & 3.) Plaintiffs have now filed a motion seeking an order requiring service by the United States Marshal, “[p]ursuant to Local Rule 4(3).” (ECF No. 5 at 1.) This court, however, has no Local Rule 4(3). Nor does plaintiffs’ motion providing any authority for the undersigned ordering service by the United States Marshal on behalf of a party not proceeding in forma pauperis. Moreover, review of plaintiffs’ complaint finds that the allegations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.