Gee

(PC) Bradford v. Gee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20212:20-cv-00714California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, Case No. 2:20-cv-00714-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

S. GEE, et al.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On September 10, 2020, the previously assigned magistrate judge dismissed plaintiff’s initial complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion for reconsideration challenging that dismissal, ECF No. 15, and a first amended complaint, ECF No. 16. On January 12, 2021, I denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and screened his first amended complaint. ECF No. 17. I found that the amended complaint had failed to state a claim and granted plaintiff sixty days to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed objections to the January 12, 2021 order, which merely note plaintiff’s disagreement with my finding that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.