Montejo

(PC) Barth v. Montejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20212:19-cv-01874California1,324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHAWN DAMON BARTH, No. 2:19-cv-1874 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

EUSEBIO MONTEJO, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, retaliated against him, and discriminated against him. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for a protective order and request for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 52.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. Plaintiff’s Motion Plaintiff states that he is requesting an injunction because the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) is “refusing to follow rules, laws, regulations [and] polic[ies].” (ECF No. 52 at 1.) He claims he is being denied eyeglasses, dental care, and medication. (ECF No. 52 at 2.) He alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.