Joksch

(PC) Elder v. Joksch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20212:16-cv-01925California594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COREY JEROME ELDER, No. 2:16-CV-1925-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SILVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 41. The Court previously addressed Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 40. The Court recommended that the District Judge grant the motion in part and deny it in part. Id. at 33. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.