(PS) Gigena v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20212:21-cv-00082California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL GIGENA, Case No. 2:21-cv-00082-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. ECF No. 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

Defendant. DISMISS THIS CASE AS FRIVOLOUS OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS 17 ORDER Plaintiff moves to proceed without prepayment of filing fees, ECF No. 2, and his affidavit satisfies the relevant requirements, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). I therefore grant the motion. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS With plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis, his complaint is now subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Plaintiff asserts that California is the property of the Kingdom of Hayah Hawah. ECF No. 1 at 4. He alleges that “the Free Sovereign People of Hayah Hawah” possess a right to control the voting shares for California and American Indian territories, and that 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.