Taylor

Taylor v. County of Calaveras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20211:18-cv-00760California1,878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL SCOTT TAYLOR, LORI Case No. 1:18-cv-00760-BAM

MELVILLE,

ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION RE: ORDER RE v. CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COUNTY OF CALAVERAS, et al., (Doc. 117) Defendants.

15 Currently before the Court is the application of Plaintiffs Michael Scott Taylor and Lori Melville (“Plaintiffs”) for reconsideration of the Court’s order on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Doc. 117.) On January 8, 2021, Defendants County of Calaveras, Rick DiBasilio, Geoffrey Ramos, Talya-Ann Mattos, and Kevin Stevens (“Defendants”) filed an opposition to the application. (Doc. 118.) Plaintiffs did not file a reply. The Court found the matter suitable for decision without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing on the application. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.