Kernan

(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20212:12-cv-00556California317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, No. 2:12-cv-0556 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. Defendants’ summary judgment motion was granted, and judgment was entered on March 24, 2021. (ECF Nos. 299, 300.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal dated March 28, 2021. (ECF No. 301.) Presently before the court is plaintiff’s second post-judgment motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 305.) Plaintiff requests the court appoint counsel because he is unable to afford an attorney. Plaintiff previously filed a motion for the appointment of counsel concurrently with the notice of appeal. (ECF No. 303.) The undersigned denied that motion based on lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 304.) Plaintiff was advised that any renewed motion for the appointment of counsel should be directed toward the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.