McKinley

McKinley v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20211:21-cv-00754California709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS MCKINLEY, II, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00754-NONE-SAB

Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING PLAINTIFF

v. DOUGLAS MCKINLEY, II’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING PLAINTIFF

TO PAY FILING FEE IN THIS MATTER

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 2, 3)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-

ONE DAYS

18 Douglas McKinley, II, and Joanna McKinley (“Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in this action on May 10, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff Douglas McKinley did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff Joanna McKinley did not file an application to proceed without prepayment or fees nor did she pay the filing fee. Upon review of Plaintiff Douglas McKinley’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court found that it was not sufficiently completed to determine if he is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.