Zepp

(PC) Rael v. Zepp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20211:21-cv-00810California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SILVESTRE RAEL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00810-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED ANDREW ZEPP, et al., (ECF No. 5) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

18 Silvestre Rael (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on May 19, 2021. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Additionally, it appears that Plaintiff did not intend to file this action in federal court. Accordingly, on May 21, 2021, the Court issued an order, directing Plaintiff to “either: 1) submit the attached application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed and signed, or in the alternative, pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action; or 2) file a notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.