(HC)Ernst

(HC)Ernst v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20212:20-cv-01716California493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN ERNST, Case No. 2:20-cv-01716-JAM-JDP (HC) Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Respondent. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On December 22, 2020, the court screened petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and notified petitioner that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 14. Petitioner was granted thirty days to either file an amended petition or to inform the court that he chooses to stand by his original petition. Id. at 2. Petitioner did neither. Accordingly, on February 26, 2021, petitioner was ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.