Trujillo

Trujillo v. Alhumidi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20211:20-cv-00127California3,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00127-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED1 YASIR ALHUMIDI, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS Defendants. (Doc. No. 17) 14 15 16 This matter was reassigned to the undersigned. (Doc. No. 20). Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for default judgment filed July 27, 2020. (Doc. No. 27). Defendants have not answered or responded to the complaint, nor have they filed any opposition or taken any actions in this case. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be granted. I. BACKGROUND On January 23, 2020, plaintiff Jose Trujillo filed a complaint against defendants Yasir Alhumidi d/b/a J Street Mini Mart, Juan Carlos d/b/a Jalisco’s Tacos, Madram M. Shuaibi, and Nasser S. Shuaibi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.