(PC) Windham v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20212:20-cv-00773California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES WINDHAM, No. 2:20-cv-773 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleged that defendants violated his rights by taking items from his cell. This case was dismissed for failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute on April 14, 2021. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) Plaintiff has now filed a notice informing the court that he is in danger. He alleges that prison officials have not taken sufficient action to protect him after prison gangs threatened to kill him. He asks the court to send “FBI, U.S. Marshals, Assistant U.S. Attorney” and seeks to prevent a transfer back to Mule Creek State Prison. To the extent plaintiff believes his rights have been violated and he is in danger, he cannot pursue relief via this action which has been closed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.