Aryad

(PC) Howard v. Aryad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20212:20-cv-00081California325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY EUGENE HOWARD, No. 2:20-cv00081 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DR. ARYAD, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order issued January 15, 2020, plaintiff was directed to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or, in the alternative, to pay the filing fees and to do so within thirty days. ECF No. 6 at 2. To that end, plaintiff was sent this court’s in forma pauperis application. At that time, plaintiff was warned that failure to properly and timely file it would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. See id. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed the in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.