Perez

(PC) O'Connor v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20212:18-cv-01057California5,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN O’CONNOR, No. 2:18-cv-1057 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

W. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 92, 123), plaintiff’s motions to expand the record (ECF Nos. 95, 102), and plaintiff’s motion for hearing (ECF No. 115). For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied. Additionally, the court will grant plaintiff’s motions to expand the record and deny his motion for hearing. //// //// //// //// BACKGROUND I. Relevant Procedural History This action proceeds on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.