Williams v. Fresno County Department of Child Support Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 9, 20211:21-cv-00434California6,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

20 Plaintiff Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis in this action. 22 Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on March 16, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On 23 April 6, 2021, before the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 5.) The FAC’s claims relate to various child support and wage and income withholding orders issued by the state court. (Id.) On April 21, 2021, the Court entered an order screening Plaintiff’s FAC and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 7.) The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the order to file an amended complaint or to notify the Court that he wants to stand on his complaint. (Id. at 14.) The Court warned Plaintiff that “[f]ailure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action.” (Id. at 15.) The thirty-day period has expired, and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, for the reasons described below, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s case be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.