Ogboona
(PC) Foust v. Ogboona
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL FOUST, No. 2:20-cv-2229-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. OGBOONA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2021, the court granted his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, obligating him to pay the filing fee in full through monthly payments. ECF No. 32; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff now seeks to be refunded the portion of the filing fee that he has already paid because the court recommended that his case be dismissed (ECF No. 38). ECF No. 40. Plaintiff is not entitled to a refund. His request is denied and he remains obligated to pay the entire filing fee “in increments.” Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002) (“Under the PLRA, all prisoners who file IFP civil actions must pay the full…