Sapaden
Sapaden v. Synchrony Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 FRANCISCO SAPADEN, Case No.: 2:21-cv-00088-KJM-JDP 11 Plaintiff, UNIFORM STIPULATED v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 SYNCHRONY BANK; FIRST ECF No. 29 NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA;
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.; and TRANSUNION,
LLC
16 Defendants. 17
19 The Court recognizes that at least some of the documents and information 20 (“materials”) being sought through discovery in the above-captioned action are, for 21 competitive reasons, normally kept confidential by the parties. The parties have agreed 22 to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order (“Order”) in this action. 23 The materials to be exchanged throughout the course of the litigation between the 24 parties may contain trade secret or other confidential research, technical, cost, price, 25 marketing or other commercial information, as is contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil 26 Procedure 26(c)(1)(G). The purpose of this Order is to protect the confidentiality of 27 such materials as much as practical during the…