Arkley

(PS) Hansen v. Arkley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20212:20-cv-02436California2,732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL JOHN HANSEN AND T J No. 2:20-cv-2436-KJM-CKD PS

HERBST TRUST 1,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND ROBIN P. ARKLEY, et al., (ECF No. 16) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Paul John Hansen proceeds without an attorney and has filed a complaint alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). (ECF No. 16.) A hearing on the motion to dismiss was held via Zoom on June 9, 2021. Plaintiff appeared pro se; attorney Rachel C. Witcher appeared on behalf of defendants.1 For the reasons set forth below, it is recommended that the motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.