(HC) Hubbard v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20212:21-cv-00040California887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DWAYNE ALLEN HUBBARD, No. 2:21-cv-00040 WBS GGH P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner’s motion to stay. ECF No. 15. Respondent has filed a statement of non-opposition. ECF No. 18. A district court may properly stay a habeas petition and hold it in abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). See King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir. 2009). Under Rhines, a district court may stay a mixed petition to allow a petitioner to present an unexhausted claim to the state courts. Rhines, 544 U.S. at 277. Assuming the petition itself has been timely filed, such a stay “eliminates entirely any limitations issue with regard to the originally unexhausted claims, as the claims remain pending in federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.